<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft is beating Google, at least in the battle for hearts and minds on Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crimsonhexagon.com/blog/2009/07/microsoft-is-beating-google-at-least-in-the-battle-for-hearts-and-minds-on-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crimsonhexagon.com/blog/2009/07/microsoft-is-beating-google-at-least-in-the-battle-for-hearts-and-minds-on-twitter/</link>
	<description>Crimson Hexagon Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:35:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: crimsonhexagon</title>
		<link>http://www.crimsonhexagon.com/blog/2009/07/microsoft-is-beating-google-at-least-in-the-battle-for-hearts-and-minds-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3087</link>
		<dc:creator>crimsonhexagon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 15:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crimsonhexagon.com/blog/?p=729#comment-3087</guid>
		<description>Well there&#039;s a first philosophical question about whether we should. In the end, regardless of reason, those people decided to chime in to the conversation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Second, our technology can discern the nature of the post, as opposed to just the fact that a a keyword was used in a tweet. Again, unless the contest indicated the user had to BOTH use a keyword and say something positive, the system would not be fooled.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Finally... it&#039;s worth pointing out that our enabling technology is far less susceptible to this kind of gaming than other approaches. Once the algorithm &quot;learns&quot; the numerical pattern that defines each theme in the conversation, it checks every single items to classify it in one or the other. That&#039;s in contrast to every other system we know of, which infers the breakdown of the &quot;forest&quot; from a limited sample of the &quot;trees&quot; which is drawn at random and assumed to be representative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well there&#39;s a first philosophical question about whether we should. In the end, regardless of reason, those people decided to chime in to the conversation.</p>
<p>Second, our technology can discern the nature of the post, as opposed to just the fact that a a keyword was used in a tweet. Again, unless the contest indicated the user had to BOTH use a keyword and say something positive, the system would not be fooled.</p>
<p>Finally&#8230; it&#39;s worth pointing out that our enabling technology is far less susceptible to this kind of gaming than other approaches. Once the algorithm &#8220;learns&#8221; the numerical pattern that defines each theme in the conversation, it checks every single items to classify it in one or the other. That&#39;s in contrast to every other system we know of, which infers the breakdown of the &#8220;forest&#8221; from a limited sample of the &#8220;trees&#8221; which is drawn at random and assumed to be representative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drewv</title>
		<link>http://www.crimsonhexagon.com/blog/2009/07/microsoft-is-beating-google-at-least-in-the-battle-for-hearts-and-minds-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3086</link>
		<dc:creator>drewv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crimsonhexagon.com/blog/?p=729#comment-3086</guid>
		<description>Microsoft has been running contests on Twitter to generate tweets about themselves.  Does this skew your analysis or do you factor them out ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft has been running contests on Twitter to generate tweets about themselves.  Does this skew your analysis or do you factor them out ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: denvan</title>
		<link>http://www.crimsonhexagon.com/blog/2009/07/microsoft-is-beating-google-at-least-in-the-battle-for-hearts-and-minds-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3067</link>
		<dc:creator>denvan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crimsonhexagon.com/blog/?p=729#comment-3067</guid>
		<description>Then take another look, because that&#039;s not the direction they&#039;re poking. Wave is being angled as the &quot;unified field theory&quot; that will bring together Instant Messaging, e-mail, document sharing, microblogging, and a few flavours of Social Media. It&#039;s designed to be (and I suspect it will be) a game-changer, so a head-to-head comparison would be difficult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then take another look, because that&#39;s not the direction they&#39;re poking. Wave is being angled as the &#8220;unified field theory&#8221; that will bring together Instant Messaging, e-mail, document sharing, microblogging, and a few flavours of Social Media. It&#39;s designed to be (and I suspect it will be) a game-changer, so a head-to-head comparison would be difficult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: denvan</title>
		<link>http://www.crimsonhexagon.com/blog/2009/07/microsoft-is-beating-google-at-least-in-the-battle-for-hearts-and-minds-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3070</link>
		<dc:creator>denvan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crimsonhexagon.com/blog/?p=729#comment-3070</guid>
		<description>Then take another look, because that&#039;s not the direction they&#039;re poking. Wave is being angled as the &quot;unified field theory&quot; that will bring together Instant Messaging, e-mail, document sharing, microblogging, and a few flavours of Social Media. It&#039;s designed to be (and I suspect it will be) a game-changer, so a head-to-head comparison would be difficult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then take another look, because that&#39;s not the direction they&#39;re poking. Wave is being angled as the &#8220;unified field theory&#8221; that will bring together Instant Messaging, e-mail, document sharing, microblogging, and a few flavours of Social Media. It&#39;s designed to be (and I suspect it will be) a game-changer, so a head-to-head comparison would be difficult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: denvan</title>
		<link>http://www.crimsonhexagon.com/blog/2009/07/microsoft-is-beating-google-at-least-in-the-battle-for-hearts-and-minds-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3073</link>
		<dc:creator>denvan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crimsonhexagon.com/blog/?p=729#comment-3073</guid>
		<description>Then take another look, because that&#039;s not the direction they&#039;re poking. Wave is being angled as the &quot;unified field theory&quot; that will bring together Instant Messaging, e-mail, document sharing, microblogging, and a few flavours of Social Media. It&#039;s designed to be (and I suspect it will be) a game-changer, so a head-to-head comparison would be difficult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then take another look, because that&#39;s not the direction they&#39;re poking. Wave is being angled as the &#8220;unified field theory&#8221; that will bring together Instant Messaging, e-mail, document sharing, microblogging, and a few flavours of Social Media. It&#39;s designed to be (and I suspect it will be) a game-changer, so a head-to-head comparison would be difficult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: denvan</title>
		<link>http://www.crimsonhexagon.com/blog/2009/07/microsoft-is-beating-google-at-least-in-the-battle-for-hearts-and-minds-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3076</link>
		<dc:creator>denvan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crimsonhexagon.com/blog/?p=729#comment-3076</guid>
		<description>Then take another look, because that&#039;s not the direction they&#039;re poking. Wave is being angled as the &quot;unified field theory&quot; that will bring together Instant Messaging, e-mail, document sharing, microblogging, and a few flavours of Social Media. It&#039;s designed to be (and I suspect it will be) a game-changer, so a head-to-head comparison would be difficult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then take another look, because that&#39;s not the direction they&#39;re poking. Wave is being angled as the &#8220;unified field theory&#8221; that will bring together Instant Messaging, e-mail, document sharing, microblogging, and a few flavours of Social Media. It&#39;s designed to be (and I suspect it will be) a game-changer, so a head-to-head comparison would be difficult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: denvan</title>
		<link>http://www.crimsonhexagon.com/blog/2009/07/microsoft-is-beating-google-at-least-in-the-battle-for-hearts-and-minds-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3079</link>
		<dc:creator>denvan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crimsonhexagon.com/blog/?p=729#comment-3079</guid>
		<description>Then take another look, because that&#039;s not the direction they&#039;re poking. Wave is being angled as the &quot;unified field theory&quot; that will bring together Instant Messaging, e-mail, document sharing, microblogging, and a few flavours of Social Media. It&#039;s designed to be (and I suspect it will be) a game-changer, so a head-to-head comparison would be difficult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then take another look, because that&#39;s not the direction they&#39;re poking. Wave is being angled as the &#8220;unified field theory&#8221; that will bring together Instant Messaging, e-mail, document sharing, microblogging, and a few flavours of Social Media. It&#39;s designed to be (and I suspect it will be) a game-changer, so a head-to-head comparison would be difficult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: denvan</title>
		<link>http://www.crimsonhexagon.com/blog/2009/07/microsoft-is-beating-google-at-least-in-the-battle-for-hearts-and-minds-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3082</link>
		<dc:creator>denvan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crimsonhexagon.com/blog/?p=729#comment-3082</guid>
		<description>Then take another look, because that&#039;s not the direction they&#039;re poking. Wave is being angled as the &quot;unified field theory&quot; that will bring together Instant Messaging, e-mail, document sharing, microblogging, and a few flavours of Social Media. It&#039;s designed to be (and I suspect it will be) a game-changer, so a head-to-head comparison would be difficult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then take another look, because that&#39;s not the direction they&#39;re poking. Wave is being angled as the &#8220;unified field theory&#8221; that will bring together Instant Messaging, e-mail, document sharing, microblogging, and a few flavours of Social Media. It&#39;s designed to be (and I suspect it will be) a game-changer, so a head-to-head comparison would be difficult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crimsonhexagon</title>
		<link>http://www.crimsonhexagon.com/blog/2009/07/microsoft-is-beating-google-at-least-in-the-battle-for-hearts-and-minds-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3066</link>
		<dc:creator>crimsonhexagon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crimsonhexagon.com/blog/?p=729#comment-3066</guid>
		<description>Fair point, Dennis. Though I don&#039;t think Wave is a poke at Outlook the way Bing, Chrome and Office are pokes at their respective adversaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair point, Dennis. Though I don&#39;t think Wave is a poke at Outlook the way Bing, Chrome and Office are pokes at their respective adversaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crimsonhexagon</title>
		<link>http://www.crimsonhexagon.com/blog/2009/07/microsoft-is-beating-google-at-least-in-the-battle-for-hearts-and-minds-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3069</link>
		<dc:creator>crimsonhexagon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crimsonhexagon.com/blog/?p=729#comment-3069</guid>
		<description>Fair point, Dennis. Though I don&#039;t think Wave is a poke at Outlook the way Bing, Chrome and Office are pokes at their respective adversaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair point, Dennis. Though I don&#39;t think Wave is a poke at Outlook the way Bing, Chrome and Office are pokes at their respective adversaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
